
Jimmy (James) Parbery

Jannine Parbery

Gayle Lord
The sole reason this website exists is because James ( Jimmy ) Parbery of Christchurch made false claims under affidavit in the High Court of NZ and he keeps keep lying about their dishonest, deceitful and criminal actions against his brother Julian & his wife Lisa and the numerous lies they have told friends, family and customers all over the world. Since we do not know how many people they have lied to we keep a central point so everyone can read the TRUTH.
Julian and Lisa Parbery will defend their Honesty and Integrity against the lies told by James ( Jimmy )
Under The Maxims of Commercial Law there are ten essential maxims or precepts in commercial law here are 3
- All are equal under the law
- In commerce Truth is sovereign
- Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit
Please see the 10 Maxims of Commercial law under these maxims I present my Affidavit and Evidence in response to the false and malicious claims made by Jimmy Parbery
This is the affidavit of Julian Parbery, it is my solemn expression of truth.
On returning from overseas working for the company in early 2009, I found that Jimmy Parbery had got into high mortgage debt for large pieces of land he bought in Loburn and as a result he had started stealing from our family business to cover his debts.
You will see from letters and documents provided here that I made every effort to resolve the issue amicably, I even took earlier legal and accountancy advise but took no further action to protect myself at the request of our mother Mrs Mary Parbery.
Jimmy decided to take control of the company and its money when I forced the issue of an audit, then Jimmy made false claims against me locked my wife and I out of our business, stopped all our income in an attempt to gain 100% control og the company and to hide the fact I was asking for an audit of the company accounts.
I have provided documents and letters from our own mother, accountants lawyers etc you can read the documentation and decide for yourself was Jimmy stealing from the business and who is telling the truth.
Regards
Julian Parbery
Please note we do not advocate that any person should take any actions against Jimmy Parbery or his family we do not believe in violence in any way, we believe in Karma .
We have a right to tell our story of his actions against us and the family business and provide letters and documentation to prove we are telling the truth under the maxims of Commercial law.
You can decide for yourself if Jimmy Parbery built his own business like he claims or he simply told untrue stories to Heat Exchanger Services customers to take the customers away from the business that Julian and Lisa paid $750,000 for.
To start with we suggest you read the Affidavit from Julian to put the company into Liquidation and follow that by the letter pages 1 to 4 written by Mrs Mary Parbery our mother asking Jimmy to reply to her questions, this letter is signed on her own in front of a Justice of the Peace
Please scroll documents as there are often many pages to read
Explanation Notes on Affidavit of Julian Parbery in support of application for the appointment of interim liquidator for Heat Exchanger Service.
Please read this document so you can see the lengths Jimmy Parbery went to to take away my share of the business.
You can decide if Jimmy Parbery is a deceitful devious dishonest unscrupulous person and as a High Court judge used the word to describe his actions
“Machinations”
(A crafty scheme or cunning design for the accomplishment of a sinister end)
Or he is an Honest business man you can trust?
You can read the evidence and decide for yourself.
Starting at section 3.0 Deadlock
3.1 On our return from working overseas for Heat Exchanger Services, Jimmy changed the locks of the business claiming that someone had damaged the locks but he would not give us a new set of keys.
As a director and 50% shareholder I was very concerned about what had been going on in the business while I was away. Jimmy then claimed that there was no job for us in our own business it became quite clear Jimmy and Jannine wanted to take control of the whole business but they did not want to pay for my share.
3.2 We met Trevor Quirke the company lawyer to try and resolve the issues, I thought Trevor was there to sort things out and make sure things were done fairly and equally, I was sadly mistaken in the end it felt like he was there to get the fee for the meetings, as my mother later pointed out nearly all the professional people seemed to care about was how much business and or ie money they could get from either person and support the person with the greater amount of business for them.
3.3 Jimmy claimed he required a meeting with an INDEPENDENT PERSON to resolve issues BEFORE he would let me back into MY OWN BUSINESS, at the request of our mother I went along with this to amicability resolve any issues.
Prior to the meeting I was told I could not see any of OUR company management accounts
Nor would Jimmy attend a shareholders meeting which I had previously called.
During this time I had managed to get a set of keys from Jimmy, but he found I had accessed the company office and printed out accounting documents after hours so on the 10th of May 2009 Jimmy AGAIN changed the locks on the company building and Locked me out a second time ( I was also a 50% owner of the building )
3.4 I attended a meeting on the 22 May 2009 with Jimmy and Matthew Gilligan I had previously written to Jimmy and asked if Gilligan was independent I was assured he was, I can provide receipts that show that Jimmy had met with Gilligan a number of time before and had engaged him to take as much of the company assets away from me as possible, Gilligan was NOT independent.
Gilligan advised me at the meeting that he was employed by Jimmy as an Asset Protection Specialists.
Later on in a 3 way conversation with Jimmy and Gilligan , Gilligan threatened me that if I did not do what Jimmy wanted he would take control of the company, I did not believe this could be done as I owned 50% of the building and the business.
3.5 Later on I found out that while I was overseas manufacturing and supplying heat exchangers to our business, Jimmy had stopped the company paying me wages ( without my knowledge or consent) and taking positive balance I had in my directors loan account and paying that to me instead so in effect the company was not paying me wages.
The idea I later found out was to run my directors account to $0 then keep paying money out until I owed the company a large amount of money and then have the company demand the money be paid back quickly, if I could not pay they would take my company shares in payment giving Jimmy control of the company.
3.6 Lisa my wife and I were both locked out of the business for a few months and unable to work for the company.
3.7 On or around 16th September 2009 at a meeting with Trevor Quirke the company lawyer, Trevor suggested that James buys my shared in the company or I buy James shares James loudly replied “ I do not want to do Either I will take independent advise” ( Unknown to us Jimmy had already planned to take over the company at this point)
3.8 On the 24the September Jimmy and Jannine flew to Auckland to meet Gilligan and the following day on Gilligans advise Jimmy removed $46500.00 from the company bank account and put the money in Jannines bank account.
3.9 On the 29th September 2009 Lisa and I were woken about 6.30am and served with a TRESSPASS NOTICE for our own business and factory The document A purported to exclude me.
All the claims in the document were made up to cover up the fact that I had requested the company accounts be audited, neither Jimmy, Jannine or the company accountants wanted this to happen as it would ruin their reputation and expose the theft going on.
All the claims against Lisa and I made in this tresspass notice were FULLY investigated by the Court appointed Liquidator and our two lawyers at a later date at a full days employment hearing at the Government Employment Agency in Chch The whole hearing was fully recorded at our request.
The Liquidator found that NONE of the claims were true, it was all made up to lock us out of the building and allow Jimmy to take over the business and refuse an audit. ( jimmy later ILLEGALLY removed me as a company director) using the companies office register and then signing off the company accounts stating he was the only Director and no audit was requested.
3.10 On September the 29th 2009 I received copies of Statutory Demands that Gilligan had served on the company for Jimmy to remove all his funds from the company
PLEASE NOTE BOTH the Statutory Demands are Dated 15th September 2009 this is the day BEFORE the last meeting with the company lawyer on the 16th September2009 where Trevor suggested that James buys my shared in the company or I buy James shares James loudly replied “ I do not want to do Either I will take independent advise” ( Unknown to us Jimmy had already planned to take over the company at this point)
Please also NOTE the Statutory Demands were written on the 15th of September 200 9but not served until the afternoon of 29th of September 2009.
The Demand states Take Notice Point 2 You have to reply within 15 days but it was served after 14.5 days had already gone so we were unable to get to the court or take action.
3.11 Over the next few days all the company funds were paid into Jannines bank account the total was $104,500.00 even the companies overdraft limit was taken so Jimmy controlled all the company money, at no point in time had I even attempted to take company money but Jimmy wanted to get his greedy hands on all the money.
3.13 Further to our meeting with Trevor Quirke on 16th September 2009 we had all agreed to meet again a few days later , Jimmy declined because as we later found out via the Statutory Demand written on the 15th September 2009 He had alredy decided to take over the company on the 15th.
3.14 We did not find out that Jimmy had takes $104500.00 of company money until the 2nd of October where our solicitor advised the bank that all withdrawals had to be signed by both directors.
By this point in time Jimmy and his wife Jannine had put all the company money in their control and then advised all customers to pay money into their bank account, making sure no money was left in the company bank accounts.
3.15 Jimmy Parbery accessed the Companies office website and purported to advise that I had resigned from the company on 29th September 2009 which I did not, Jimmy needed to do this because the company accounts needed to be filed and could not be previously filed because I refused to sign them off.
Once Jimmy removed me as a Company Director he was the Sole Director , he could sign off the accounts, have them filed and AVOID the AUDIT I requested.
3.16 We wrote to Kiwibank about the illegal transfer of funds from a company bank account to a personal bank account, the bank were not very helpful.
3.17 We tried to get the company money paid to the company lawyer so an independent person could control the money James refuse.
3.18 Jimmy advised customers not to pay company money to the companies BNZ bank account but to pay money to his wife’s Kiwibank account so he can control all the company money.
3.19 Jimmy carried on lying to everyone, he tried to turn all the employees against me on this point when we later bought the company most of the employees decided to come and work for me, some of them are still working for me.
3.20 Jimmy’s lawyer claims that they are going to take a claim against Lisa and I ( All the claims were later investigated and found to be false) Jimmy files a claim with the court and we progress to a trial in front of a High Court Judge, one week before the trial after all the preparation and large amounts of paperwork are done and paid for Jimmy decides not to proceed.
The tactic was to waste as much of my money as possible because Jimmy believed he had deeper pockets and that he could outlast me and then he could pick up what was left of the solvent liquidation of our family company.
3.21 In response to Jimmy’s lawyers false claims please read the reply from my lawyer as stated earlier these claims were all made up to put pressure on me to sell my shares to Jimmy, they believed we would crumble under the legal financial burden and Jimmy would pick up the company for little money and Lisa my wife and I would end up broke, this is Jimmys plan for challenging him that I wanted an audit of company accounts.
3.22
A The company is in dispute
B Jimmy refuses to appoint an Auditor( I wonder why)
C The company bank requires two signatures( previously I had trusted Jimmy and given him the rights to sign cheques on his own
( I did not know he was a thief then)
D Jimmy would not talk to me, his way or he would take it by force
E Jimmy stopped my income and my wife’s so we were unable to pay the mortgage or buy food.
Jimmy locked us out of the business and put a security guard on the factory to stop us going to work.
F The business was suffering and causing employee problems Jimmy was lying to employees Jimmy told them they could not talk with me.
G As a Company Director I was refused access to a business and property I owned and refused financial information.
H Jimmy Served two Statutory Demands on the company hoping to force me to give Jimmy my shares Please note we found out later Jimmy had no intention of forcing the Statutory Demands as he was a director he would have been held responsible for forcing liquidation on his own company.
4.00 We requested an INDEPENDENT third party ie Liquidator be appointed
The Judge appointed a liquidator at our request.
AGAIN PLEASE NOTE at any time Jimmy could have appealed the appointment of the Liquidator but he did not because all his evidence was false and would not stand up in court.
4.1 James would not discuss any issues ( he was going to get control of our family business and he would do whatever it took to do that.
Later on Jimmy borrowed $1.2,0000.00 One point two MILLION dollars to buy the company loans from the BNZ to force receivership and Mortgagee sale on our family business and building.
The document below is a letter to Jimmy from our mother to Jimmy after he sent our mother a letter stating I had selectively given her information, our mother was given access to my extensive files and any claim Jimmy made could be rebutted with documentation, our mother took this letter to a Justice of the Pease on her own and had it signed and witnessed.
When mother went to stay with Jimmy she asked him for evidence and she told me that all he could reply was
” But mum I did nothing wrong”
Please scroll the documents to read them, some have many pages
James Parbery honesty and integrity challenge. Please read the letters below.
When Julian and James’ 86 year old mother Mary wanted to come to NZ from the UK for what may be her last visit, James told her he did not have the money to pay for half the flight, despite his claims of business doing well, and he told her that she couldn’t stay with him as there was no space in his house when Julian took their mother to Christchurch at her request and dropped her off at James house unannounced, James miraculously found space for her to stay for a couple of days.
During that time Mary stayed with James he made no effort to give mother any proof of Julian’s guilt.
Mary later requested James provide her written evidence to the questions written below, at that point she had spent over 4 months reading bundles of court documents showing both both Julian and James claims, so she had a clear view from BOTH SIDES.
James only reply to his mother was that he wanted to talk to her and Julian had not told her the truth but he still was unable to give his mother any answers to her questions as written below or provide ONE SINGLE DOCUMENT OF PROOF.
James has had 3 chances to put his claims against Julian in front of a High Court Judge and each time James chose to settle rather than go to court, why if he is telling the truth?
Damning letters from James’ mother, witnessed by a Justice of the Peace.
Jimmy in September 2009 Locked Julian and his wife out of the business using false claims so he could take control of the business and all its income and spent it as he wished.
We will clearly prove that the dispute started many months before when Julian and Lisa found Jimmy had been stealing from the family business, Julian and Lisa tried to amicably resolve this issue many months before, Jimmy resisted the investigation and replied ” Fukc You Julian what are you going to do about it” when I stated that I was going to ask for the company accounts to be audited Jimmy hired a fancy accountant and barrister from Auckland , made false allegations to cover up the request for an audit.
Below are documents that will show as far back as May 2009 Julian and Lisa tried to resolve issues of theft and fraud at Heat Exchanger Services.
May 2023.
James may claim that Heat Exchanger Services is part Chinese owned and a NZ citizen of Chinese origin is the cause of his actions toward Julian. Heat Exchanger Services is 100% NZ owned. He may also imply that his business does not buy Chinese product. Most aluminium radiators and oil coolers are made in China, even OEM ones.
Materials in copper or brass radiators his business buys are made in China or India.
Many top brands of mobile phones, TVs, whiteware, computers, tools etc etc are made in China.
James may claim that what he did was to protect the business from his brother.
If that were true, why did he take illegal actions rather than take appropriate legal actions via company lawyer, accountant or relevant authority (Police etc)?
Why has he allowed information on this website to remain for over 12 years if the evidence is untrue?
Because all the documentary evidence shows we have always told the truth.
December 2016: Jimmy can’t stop his lying ways… Customers still being lied to. Jimmy is still claiming Heat Exchanger Services is at his premises. Another couple of Jimmy’s customers have been told the truth. No longer Jimmy’s customers. Oops. Keep on lying, keep getting found out, keep losing customers.
Would you trust your supplier if you knew they were lying to you?
Must be tiring having to be at work all the time cover up the lies and deceit. Can’t afford to go on holidays or be sick… Can’t trust anyone else to run the business.
Wouldn’t be nice to have people to run your business while you are on holiday (again) or overseas for work (again)….
March 2016: It has been determined that Andrew Magon has been visiting customers and lying about Heat Exchanger Services. Deception by Jimmy and Andrew Magon – click here.
You cannot not trust Andrew or Jimmy!!!
February 2016: Customers still being lied to about Heat Exchanger Services.
There is only 1 Heat Exchanger Services Ltd business in 1 location.
It has NOT changed location since 2011.
February 2016: Liquidator completes liquidation and pays in Julian’s favour. Jimmy loses.
Finally after nearly 8 years, Jimmy’s attempts, to take control, deprive Julian of income and ownership, deny and obstruct access to wages owed and the proceeds of Julian’s 50% share in the business and premises, have failed.
July 2015: Customers still being lied to by Jimmy.
May 2015: Jimmy concedes – asks for settlement to avoid liquidation court action.
Why? What was he afraid of? The truth being made public…..
Settlement successfully negotiated on Julian’s terms.
Jimmy wanted the settlement terms to be confidential – WHY??
Why would Jimmy refuse an audit of the company accounts? What did he have to hide? A lot as it turns out.
How does one sleep at night having lied to, and deprived one’s own family (brothers, mother and father in-law)?
Would you lie to, and steal from your best friend?
Would you lie to, and steal from your business partner?
Would you lie to, and steal from your own family?
If you order, receive goods, sell some of them, then don’t pay for them, is it likely the remaining goods will be repossessed by the supplier?
During the receivership:
Were goods ordered and paid for by Heat Exchanger Services then intercepted by Jimmy?
Were goods removed from Heat Exchanger Services premises by Jimmy?
August 2014. Robert’s (James’ father in-law) threatening, demanding, harassing phone calls are hollow, without substance and will achieve nothing. History of harassment by Robert Dent – click here.
In his liquidation judgement, Judge Doherty stated in point [3] b), “The second defendant has purchased the security interest of Heat Exchanger Services Limited’s bankers and by machination appointed a receiver”
Judge Doherty’s liquidation judgement
More facts and documented evidence of James’ actions follow below.
As a shareholder, Julian had a right to request and audit. James (Jimmy) Parbery responded by hiring an accountant and barrister and making a whole raft of false claims against him. All of these false claims were investigated at a meeting of lawyers and the official assignee, who had been placed in control of the company after a High Court judge suspended James because of his actions in trying to take sole control of the family business. The meeting took place in the government employment offices in Christchurch and Julian and his wife were cleared of James’ false claims.
August 2013: Mortgagee losses court action: Julian successfully negotiates a settlement.
James concedes and gives up mortgagee losses court action.
Liquidation can proceed to conclusion.
July 2013: Jimmy (James) has been lying again. More customers being deceived. Deception by Jimmy – click here.
May 2013: Robert Dent, Jannine’s father (James’ father in law) made numerous (11 on one day) phone calls to Heat Exchanger Services, private mobiles and homes during day and evenings, trying to “mediate” but resulting in threats. The Police were contacted twice. They treated it as harassment and told him to stop.
Why would James refuse an audit?
James may claim that what he did was to protect the business from his brother. If that were true, why did he take illegal actions rather than take appropriate legal actions via company lawyer, accountant or relevant authority (Police etc)?
If you have spoken to James, Gayle or Jannine in recent times you will not have been told the truth about what happened at Heat Exchanger Services in the years before 2011.
In early 2009 his brother found evidence of fraud, theft, missing money and illegal actions by James and Gayle Lord, including the way his salary was being paid.
James’ brother requested an audit, which James refused.
James removed his brother as a director on the companies website, falsely signed the business accounts and filed a false annual return.
James was charged with 2 crimes against the Companies act, to which he pleaded guilty.
James claims that he was advised to take actions, including transferring business funds to another account, at a meeting with Matthew Gilligan on 25 Sept 2009 and yet statutory demands, written by Matthew Gilligan, are dated 15 Sept 2009 – the planning was already in place.
On 28 Sept 2009, James stated his view that he saw “no alternative other than liquidation”, and proposed appointing an “independent liquidator. Matthew Gilligan has offered to accept such appointment.” BUT in a meeting on 22 May 2009, Matthew Gilligan advised that he was attending on behalf of James as an Asset Protection Specialist AND the statutory demands, written by Matthew Gilligan, are dated 15 Sept 2009, both before James proposed appointing independent liquidator Matthew Gilligan – Oops…
James and Gayle Lord illegally moved business funds to James’ wife(Jannine)’s bank account. They then proceeded to use the false documentation to setup a new business account, which his brother had no access to, and moved the funds there.
James served statutory demands that the business pay shareholders James and his Trust what was owed to them, thereby making the business bankrupt, in an attempt to gain controlling share.
James served trespass notices on his brother and his wife and used October security to deny them access to the business and building in which he was 50% owner. They were denied the right to go to work.
James did not want to mediate and advised that further communications be via lawyers.
Having been denied access to the business by James and his refusal of an audit and mediation, his brother had no choice but to seek liquidation of the business.
Based on the evidence submitted, the High Court approved a no notification liquidation order, removed James from his director role and appointed a statutory supervisor to manage the business. James stayed as an employee. James had 5 days to provide evidence to prove what was submitted to the High Court was not true. He did not provide such evidence. A date was set for the High Court to make the final liquidation decision.
The statutory supervisor reinstated the proper payment of his brother’s salary.
At the final liquidation hearing, James managed to convince the Judge to allow time for mediation. Another date was set.
A company, HES Finance, was incorporated on 8 April 2010, before the final liquidation hearing and subsequent mediation, to hide behind and as the entity for sinister financial schemes that followed James’ failure to sign the mediated settlement agreement.
James then proceeded to use the false documentation to borrow approximately $1.2 Million, repaid the BNZ business and building loans and assigned (gave) the paperwork (worth $0) to HES Finance who, appointed receiver, Grant Reynolds, to force the sale of the business, and forced mortgagee sale of the premises. The receiver made James’ brother and his wife redundant.
At the next High Court liquidation hearing, the Judge was not impressed by James’ “machinations” (sinister or evil actions).
The Judge ruled that the business be liquidated.
Due to the receivership, the business was advertised nationwide and sold by tender as a going concern.
James submitted an invalid tender as no deposit was paid. The receiver still accepted it !!!
James’ brother submitted the winning tender and subsequently became 100% owner of Heat Exchanger Services.
The receiver failed to pay company tax and, file tax and GST returns, incurring penalties and UOM interest !!!
James, Jannine and Gayle were made redundant.
James brought and lost High Court action trying to falsely claim $40,000.
The premises was sold in 2012 at a loss of more than $100,000 after being in the red zone and after HES Finance refused an offer that would possibly have not have resulted in a loss, forced Heat Exchanger Services as tenant out in July 2011 and failed to sell at auction and later by tender.
James has brought more court action to try to claim loss.
Heat Exchanger Services has had people saying that Jimmy has been lying about what happened and that Heat Exchanger Services had moved to his location or closed and he was doing the work.
Detailed events and documented evidence follow:
